
If you look closely at the picture you will see a revised, more retro logo. They are testing the look in San Diego. Nevermind, that some folks are making a fuss of the bare-breasted maiden, which I think is kind of silly considering the world we live in; what bothers me is the messing with one of the most recognizable logos in the world. Coke, Pepsi, McDonalds, and somewhere up there near them is Starbucks. Plus, they changed the color from green to brown. I wonder about the "corporate boys" sometimes. Who gets these ideas? Imagine UPS changing their colors to Green or IBM to red?
The Starbucks growth story is one of the late 20th century's eight wonders of the world. Along with Google and Apple recently, they kind of represent business in a post-50's world. But in my view, every decision they are making right now is bad, including the Pike Valley Blend, introduced with much celebrity, but which is just not very good.
No company can continue to grow as Starbucks has. Something always comes along to change the dynamic that fed the growth -- a bad economy, a tired concept, or competition catching up -- and all of these are hurting Starbucks.
Will they come back? I think so, China Starbucks is booming at a 20% clip, but the first step in the USA is plain and simple, get the coffee right again.
---------------------------------------------------
Final personal comment: the wife and daughter are, for the first time in 10 years, choosing to go to McDonalds for coffee. It tastes good, it's cheaper and the grandkids can play in he playground. They are boycotting the absence of Sumatra at Starbucks.

